Remains of one of the earliest members of the English royal family may have been unearthed in a German cathedral, a Bristol University research team says. They believe a near-complete female skeleton, aged 30 to 40, found wrapped in silk in a lead coffin in Magdeburg Cathedral is that of Queen Eadgyth. The granddaughter of Alfred the Great, she married Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor, in 929. She died 17 years later, at 36. The team aims to prove her identity by tracing isotopes in her bones. Professor Mark Horton, of Bristol's department of archaeology and anthropology, said: "We know that Saxon royalty moved around quite a lot, and we hope to match the isotope results with known locations around Wessex and Mercia, where she could have spent her childhood. Bones moved "If we can prove this truly is Eadgyth, this will be one of the most exciting historical discoveries in recent years." Their preliminary findings are to be announced later at a conference at the university.
It was thought the tomb was a cenotaph, but when the lid was removed, the coffin was discovered, bearing Queen Eadgyth's name and accurately recording the date - 1510 - when her remains were transferred. The queen was known to have been buried initially in the Monastery of Mauritius in Magdeburg, and if bones were to be found, they would have been moved later to the tomb. Professor Harald Meller, who led the 2008 project, said: "We still are not completely certain that this is Eadgyth although all the scientific evidence points to this interpretation.
Queen Eadgyth's brother, King Athelstan, is considered to have been the first king of England after he unified various Saxon and Celtic kingdoms after the battle of Brunanburh in 937, Bristol University said. After marriage, Queen Eadgyth lived in Saxony and had two children with Otto. Their direct descendents ruled Germany until 1254 and formed many of the royal families of Europe that followed. |
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Early queen's skeleton 'found in German cathedral'
South Koreans told to go home and make babies

![]() South Korea has one of the world's lowest birth rates |
South Korean government workers are being given an unusual instruction - go home and multiply.
At 1900 on Wednesday, officials at the Ministry of Health will turn off all the lights in the building. They want to encourage staff to go home to their families and, well, make bigger ones. They plan to repeat the experiment every month.
The country has one of the world's lowest birth rates, lower even than neighbouring Japan.
Office lights switched off for South Korea's procreation family day
The Ministry of Health, now sometimes jokingly referred to as the Ministry of Matchmaking, is in charge of spearheading this drive, and it clearly believes its staff should lead by example.
Generous gift vouchers are on offer for officials who have more than one child, and the department organises social gatherings in the hope of fostering love amongst its bureaucrats.
But critics say what is really needed is widescale reform to tackle the burdensome cost of childcare and education that puts many young people off starting a family.
Your Comments
The cost of nursery care in Korea can be four times that of a full-time university student's tuition. Plus, many parents feel compelled by competition to have private tutoring for their kids, even in primary school. An average family spends up to 50% of their income on one child's education so it's no wonder only the well-off can have two or more kids, and the poorest can't even begin to start families. The emphasis on education here is a bit extreme.
David Karaolou, Seoul
Family is of the utmost importance in Korean society. It is difficult, however, to provide an exceptional childhood, a world-class education and a head-start in life to more than one or two children per family. All of these appear to be mandatory to a "successful" Korean life. Without lowering the cost of education, Korea's birth rate will remain stagnant, or in decline.
Anon, Seoul
I spend quite a bit of time in Seoul on business and I can confirm that the Koreans work extremely long hours. The young software engineers will work till 0300 or 0500 and then stagger in the next day at 1100 ashen faced. Obviously, this leaves no time for procreation. One Wednesday last year they were all sent home at 1800 for a half day and nine months later two babies arrived on the scene. Now, it is company policy to take a half day (ie stop at 6pm) on Wednesdays, but they tend to sneak back in to get working again.
James Mahon, Dublin Ireland / Seoul South Korea
It says something about Korean civil servants that sending people home once a month at 1900 is early. However the likelihood of this resulting in a change is slim. There are plenty of diversions between the office and home. Korea is a very social country where after work dinner/drinking parties are more the norm than exception. It is entirely probable that this effort could have quite the opposite effect than intended.
RJC, South Korea
It is normal for women who have a baby to be fired in Korea. Given this situation, women do not want to have a baby. Moreover, the government in Seoul doesn't say anything to support a family. It's quite ridiculous.
Seongjin, Gwangju
I am a 30 old Korean man studying and staying in Paris. First of all, I am sick of this kind of show from the government. Young Korean couples worry about the burden of caring and raising children. There are not enough public day nurseries and private ones are extremely expensive. But it's not just the cost of childcare, housing is also expensive and even less affordable on a pension. The most serious problem is in education. The majority of students attend private classes after school which is very costly.
Sangwook Lee, Paris, France
In South Korea I see my co-workers working all the hours God sends. They only have 10 days off a year and an additional seven to 10 days off for national holidays (in South Korea, if a national holiday lands on a weekend, it is lost). Also, there is not much job security in terms of when a woman falls pregnant. A co-worker of mine told me that if she fell pregnant her job would not be guaranteed on her return to work ie there is no real maternity leave! These things have to be changed if the South Korean government want to increase the birth rate. There are few monetary incentives and the biggest problem for women is job security.
A P, Seoul
It baffles me how governments tend to focus on the issues which are not a priority. Instead of looking so far into the future, they need to focus on the people who are actually living here and now, namely the homeless, those in poverty or struggling financially and emotionally. Should they succeed in creating a country that is at present giving its people a higher standard of living and a positive environment in which to live, then maybe couples will have a little more incentive to make additions to it's population! Governments do not need nor do they have the right to interfere in a matter that mother nature has been dealing with since life began!
Edel O'Driscoll, Osan, South Korea
This issue may also have something to do with the long working hours endemic to the cities of Korea, where the majority of the population now live. Late nights at the office means social evenings are either spent drinking with work colleagues or put off altogether because people are too tired - neither of which are ideal baby-making conditions. The intense study culture as well as mandatory military service for men means many Koreans put their potential family life on hold until much later, often well into their thirties. Until Korean workers feel it's ok to go home before their boss at least once in a week they simply won't have time for match-making!
Tonight Show host Conan O'Brien gets $45m pay-off

O'Brien (l) took over from Leno (r) as Tonight Show host in June 2009
NBC has reached a $45m (£28m) agreement with Conan O'Brien over his late-night US talk show, paving the way for his predecessor Jay Leno to return.
O'Brien, 46, will be paid in excess of $33m (£20m) to end his seven-month reign as host of The Tonight Show, with the remainder going to his staff. The deal allows Leno, 59, to return to the show, a programme he hosted for 17 years before leaving last May.
O'Brien, who took over in June, will host his final programme on Friday.
Actor Tom Hanks is scheduled to appear, as is comedian Will Ferrell - O'Brien's first guest as Tonight Show host when he began his stint last year.
Leno will return to The Tonight Show on 1 March, NBC announced on Thursday.
Ratings slump
The deal brings to a close an ignominious battle that has seen both hosts discuss the dispute on NBC's own airwaves.
It will also allow Leno to bounce back following the failure of his 2200 prime-time show, launched in September, to pull in audiences.
O'Brien, who used to host a show in a later slot before filling Leno's shoes, will be allowed to return to TV in eight months.
"He just wants to get back on the air as quickly as possible," his manager Gavin Polone told the Wall Street Journal.
It is unclear, though, whether any of NBC's rivals will be prepared to sign him up following The Tonight Show's ratings slump during his tenure.
The dispute has provided plenty of comic material for O'Brien's late-night competitors, among them veteran broadcaster David Letterman.
The 62-year-old, who hosts The Late Show on CBS, had been expected to take over The Tonight Show from the late Johnny Carson prior to Leno's appointment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)