Saturday, May 1, 2010
China’s Manufacturer Opens New Headquarters in LA
It was seen lately that China’s carmaker are planning to sell autos in US by the End of the year and would open its new North American headquarters in Los Angeles.
It was told by the City officials that arrival of BYD Inc. of Shenzhen, China, would pay big money to the new managers, designers and engineers who would be hired. According to the officials, several hundred new jobs would be expected in United States in the related industries involving service and sales.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said that the green energy programs was paying off and was attracting high-tech, clean-energy companies. This green energy program helps in reducing pollution and usage of oil.
"As I've always said, what is good for the environment is also good for the economy", said Schwarzenegger in a news conference at City Hall. In the conference BYD officials were received by him, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, company's Chairman and Founder, Wang Chaun-fu.
BYD was started in 1995 by Wang and now it is the world's major producer of rechargeable batteries for cell phones and laptop computers.
The people employed in the company are 150,000 and they produce solar panels, lighting systems. They are working on the technology which would be used to store solar energy.
Governments, businesses to discuss cybersecurity threats
Government officials and business leaders from around the world are meeting in Texas this week to discuss what all agree is an area of common and growing concern: cybersecurity.
The Worldwide Cybersecurity Summit, hosted by the EastWest Institute (EWI), opens in Dallas on Monday and will feature three days of discussions on ways to protect the world's digital infrastructure from electronic threats.
Among those scheduled to address the gathering, being held in the wake of sophisticated cyberattacks on Google which the Internet giant said originated in China, are President Barack Obama's National Security Advisor James Jones and White House cybersecurity coordinator Howard Schmidt.
The EWI, a non-partisan think tank, is bringing together 400 government officials, business leaders and cybersecurity experts from China, France, Germany, India, Russia, the United States and nearly three dozen other countries to "map the dangers and areas of cooperation" in cyberspace.
"The skyrocketing severity and frequency of cyberattacks against businesses, governments and other institutions globally pose an ominous threat to the stability of the international economy and peace itself," according to the EWI.
"Nations have well established rules of the game on land, sea, air and in outer space," it said. "There is a significant lack of such rules in the fifth common domain -- cyberspace."
Ahead of the meeting, the EWI and Public Strategies conducted a survey of government officials, business leaders and cybersecurity experts on their perception of the dangers in cyberspace.
Thirty-four government officials and 103 business executives or experts, many of whom plan to attend the cybersecurity summit in Dallas, responded to the April 19-26 survey, for which they were guaranteed anonymity.
When asked to rate the cybersecurity threat to governments and businesses on a scale of one to 10 with nine or ten representing a "profound threat," more than 80 percent of both groups agreed that the threat ranked a six or higher.
Forty-eight percent of both groups said they faced a "profound threat" while only three percent from each category said they faced "no threat."
Only four percent of the government officials and eight percent of the business leaders and cybersecurity experts rated the security of government computer systems and those of businesses as "very secure."
Sixty-seven percent of government officials said their computer grid was "not very secure" while 33 percent of business leaders and experts said the computer systems of businesses in their country were not very secure.
"The consensus on threat levels is quite high," said EWI vice president Andrew Nagorski. "There's a general understanding that if there are major cyberattacks this is going to have a major economic impact."
Participants in the survey also agreed that international tensions are likely to escalate if concerns over cybersecurity are not addressed.
Sixty-seven percent of the government officials said that if current cybersecurity policies prove ineffective, "deteriorating relations, angry recriminations and growing distrust" could result among countries such as China, India, Russia and the United States.
Fifty-one percent of the business leaders and experts expressed the same fear.
"This survey demonstrates how much more we need to do to implement policies that keep pace with the breakneck speed of technological advances," said EWI president and chief executive John Edwin Mroz.
"We need private-public partnerships and we need international cooperation to make cyberspace safe and secure," he said. "These results point to an urgent need to build trust, not only between countries but also between governments and businesses on a global level."
The Worldwide Cybersecurity Summit, hosted by the EastWest Institute (EWI), opens in Dallas on Monday and will feature three days of discussions on ways to protect the world's digital infrastructure from electronic threats.
Among those scheduled to address the gathering, being held in the wake of sophisticated cyberattacks on Google which the Internet giant said originated in China, are President Barack Obama's National Security Advisor James Jones and White House cybersecurity coordinator Howard Schmidt.
The EWI, a non-partisan think tank, is bringing together 400 government officials, business leaders and cybersecurity experts from China, France, Germany, India, Russia, the United States and nearly three dozen other countries to "map the dangers and areas of cooperation" in cyberspace.
"The skyrocketing severity and frequency of cyberattacks against businesses, governments and other institutions globally pose an ominous threat to the stability of the international economy and peace itself," according to the EWI.
"Nations have well established rules of the game on land, sea, air and in outer space," it said. "There is a significant lack of such rules in the fifth common domain -- cyberspace."
Ahead of the meeting, the EWI and Public Strategies conducted a survey of government officials, business leaders and cybersecurity experts on their perception of the dangers in cyberspace.
Thirty-four government officials and 103 business executives or experts, many of whom plan to attend the cybersecurity summit in Dallas, responded to the April 19-26 survey, for which they were guaranteed anonymity.
When asked to rate the cybersecurity threat to governments and businesses on a scale of one to 10 with nine or ten representing a "profound threat," more than 80 percent of both groups agreed that the threat ranked a six or higher.
Forty-eight percent of both groups said they faced a "profound threat" while only three percent from each category said they faced "no threat."
Only four percent of the government officials and eight percent of the business leaders and cybersecurity experts rated the security of government computer systems and those of businesses as "very secure."
Sixty-seven percent of government officials said their computer grid was "not very secure" while 33 percent of business leaders and experts said the computer systems of businesses in their country were not very secure.
"The consensus on threat levels is quite high," said EWI vice president Andrew Nagorski. "There's a general understanding that if there are major cyberattacks this is going to have a major economic impact."
Participants in the survey also agreed that international tensions are likely to escalate if concerns over cybersecurity are not addressed.
Sixty-seven percent of the government officials said that if current cybersecurity policies prove ineffective, "deteriorating relations, angry recriminations and growing distrust" could result among countries such as China, India, Russia and the United States.
Fifty-one percent of the business leaders and experts expressed the same fear.
"This survey demonstrates how much more we need to do to implement policies that keep pace with the breakneck speed of technological advances," said EWI president and chief executive John Edwin Mroz.
"We need private-public partnerships and we need international cooperation to make cyberspace safe and secure," he said. "These results point to an urgent need to build trust, not only between countries but also between governments and businesses on a global level."
Hero Honda Karizma-R: The Safety net bike
Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTS-i
Men/women plus money plus a product(s) to choose is a potent combination for confusion. Why, you might ask. I suggest, take a look at your girlfriend or wife, with the former being preferable in this case.
What happens when you have the terrible misfortune of going out with your/a girlfriend? Let’s assume that you’re solvent enough to spend about INR 2000 on your lady’s shopping excursion to buy a hand bag. What happens then?
The lady, if you’ve got the luck of a gambler betting on India defeating Afghanistan at T20 cricket, will go about choosing a handbag that costs well within your budget. No sir, you can’t have more luck than that. So, your girlfriend will certainly be stuck up with an in-decision making process that involves an indeterminate number of choices and this is as certain as the sun rising tomorrow morning from the east.
A similar, though to a degree much lesser than the dilemma listed above happens when a bloke has about INR 1 Lakh to spend on a motorcycle in the Indian market. That is, if you have money/access to money beforehand, which in my opinion simply makes it difficult to decide.
One of our readers sent us an email asking for our help in enabling him decide on a motorcycle for himself. Here’s what he sent us.
Can you help me with two things? 1) I have planned to buy a 180cc+ vehicle. My list has P220, RTR180 and ZMR. Then i decided to go in for RTR180 but it vibrates a lot. I dont wanna buy r15 cause it is not comfortable for me and also to ride in city traffic. P220 i dont like its look and also ZMR. I wanted to know is there any 180cc+ bike going to be launched? If yes when will it be launched. Also wen is RTR 200/220/250 going to be launched? Please help me out in this issue and also suggest me a good bike. I need good power, pick-up, mileage not lesser then 35km/lt, good looks & should be 180cc and above. Thanks again.
This man is a bright chap. He’s eliminated most of the stuff that he doesn’t like. For example, the R15 gets the boot for the lack of low end torque and the crouched, somewhat uncomfortable riding position. The RTR180 is out of the window because at certain rpms it can cause your dental fixtures to fall out. The Pulsar 220 looks bad according to this particular reader and we simply cannot disagree as motorcycles, are like the women we choose for ourselves. One size/look doesn’t fit all. The ZMR, which is honestly in the ugliest thing only surpassed by maybe, Rakhi Sawant, thankfully isn’t an option. Now, if you’re a Rakhi Sawant fan, this is the least, I repeat, the least you deserve.
So what are your options that will be fast, that won’t be an alternate to a dildo and that will still manage to deliver about 35 Kmpl a liter. The Apache 200/220 might be the answer but that isn’t an option we would lean on until we get a confirmation on it’s launch. Yes, there has murmurs of the Apache 200/220 being launched in the next two months going on across the Indian auto blogosphere, but every two months, the previous two months are being replaced by the next two. So, we simply cannot count on the Apache 200/220 although we know for a fact that the motorcycle has been homologated at ARAI.
If I were to face this particular dilemma and go for a motorcycle that is reasonably fast(read a genuine top speed of 125 Kph), has a great upright riding posture and rides well, looks reasonably good or in the least better than the miss ugly ZMR and still delivers above 35 Kmpl, I would simply go out and buy the Karizma-R. What this motorcycle gives me is a unstressed bullet proof engine that might well, outlast the Apache and the Pulsar 220 put together. A riding position that might make a Splendor rider/uncle also happy. Acceleration and top speed that will more or less show most motorcycles a clean pair of heels. Then you also get the brilliant quality that Hero Honda or should that read, Honda offers. All this at a price of under INR 85 thousand makes it a sweet deal that you simply can’t go wrong with. Safety net, that in other words is what at Hero Honda Karizma-R is.
On the other hand, if you pick a motorcycle that you’d really love to own, even before you have enough Gandhibacks in the bank, it becomes pretty easy. You can start saving up, and then buy the motorcycle of your dreams when you’ve mustered enough cash. It’s really that simple and I’d certainly go with this option.
US warns of 'imminent' attacks in India
The United States has warned its citizens of possible "imminent" attacks by militants on New Delhi, as the Indian police are put on high alert.
"There are increased indications that terrorists are planning imminent attacks in New Delhi," said a statement on the US embassy's website.
On Saturday, the Canadian and Australian missions in India followed similar warnings, cautioning their nationals against visiting certain parts of the country and avoid crowded shopping areas.
The new warnings suggest that a terrorist attack could be carried out in busy market places within the coming days or weeks.
The Indian Home Ministry says it is aware of the threats while the government has put its police force on high alert.
New Delhi has often blamed Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) for aiding militant groups carrying out attacks in India. Islamabad has denied the charges.
The old rivals have a history of mistrust and have fought three wars since their independence from Britain in 1947.
"There are increased indications that terrorists are planning imminent attacks in New Delhi," said a statement on the US embassy's website.
On Saturday, the Canadian and Australian missions in India followed similar warnings, cautioning their nationals against visiting certain parts of the country and avoid crowded shopping areas.
The new warnings suggest that a terrorist attack could be carried out in busy market places within the coming days or weeks.
The Indian Home Ministry says it is aware of the threats while the government has put its police force on high alert.
New Delhi has often blamed Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) for aiding militant groups carrying out attacks in India. Islamabad has denied the charges.
The old rivals have a history of mistrust and have fought three wars since their independence from Britain in 1947.
Musharraf soon to return in country: Afghan
CHAKWAL (SANA): Former law minister Dr Sher Afghan Khan Niazi has said that former President Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf will soon return in the country.
He said it is the wrong understanding of PPP and PML-N that former President Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf will not return in Pakistan.
This he said while in a telephonic talk with the representatives of Chakwal Press Club, adding that Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan’s statement that Pervez Musharraf is a coward man and will never returned to Pakistan is like a buttering of President Asif Ali Zardari for grabbing of some big post in the government.
Sher Afghan Niazi said that Pervez Musharraf have become a monster for PPP and PML-N.
He said Pervez Musharraf had given the right of appointments in the higher judiciary to the Chief Justice of Pakistan through 17th amendment but present government through 18th amendment included the government involvement in the appointments of the judges’ in higher judiciary, which shows that the Musharraf era was better than present government ear.
He said that Musharraf is pioneer of electronic media in Pakistan, adding that today media is big power in Pakistan which is the result of Musharraf’s polices.
Afghan further said that instantly after the registration of All Pakistan Muslim League, the schedule for the Musharraf return will be announced.
He said there is no hurdle in the return of Musharraf, adding that Musharraf is ready to tackle every kind of situation after his return to Pakistan.
He said that strong leadership could bring out the country out of this present situation.
He said it is the wrong understanding of PPP and PML-N that former President Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf will not return in Pakistan.
This he said while in a telephonic talk with the representatives of Chakwal Press Club, adding that Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan’s statement that Pervez Musharraf is a coward man and will never returned to Pakistan is like a buttering of President Asif Ali Zardari for grabbing of some big post in the government.
Sher Afghan Niazi said that Pervez Musharraf have become a monster for PPP and PML-N.
He said Pervez Musharraf had given the right of appointments in the higher judiciary to the Chief Justice of Pakistan through 17th amendment but present government through 18th amendment included the government involvement in the appointments of the judges’ in higher judiciary, which shows that the Musharraf era was better than present government ear.
He said that Musharraf is pioneer of electronic media in Pakistan, adding that today media is big power in Pakistan which is the result of Musharraf’s polices.
Afghan further said that instantly after the registration of All Pakistan Muslim League, the schedule for the Musharraf return will be announced.
He said there is no hurdle in the return of Musharraf, adding that Musharraf is ready to tackle every kind of situation after his return to Pakistan.
He said that strong leadership could bring out the country out of this present situation.
Madhuri Gupta claims she is being framed
Madhuri Gupta, a junior Indian official arrested on the charges of spying for Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), told a court here on Saturday that she was being framed. | |
According to a police official, Madhuri Gupta, 53, said she was not a senior officer and could not have passed on sensitive information to her contacts in Pakistan where she was posted in the Indian High Commission. Madhuri, who had been in police custody for five days, also said she had revealed the identities of Indian undercover agents in Pakistan. According to court sources, the police wanted to extend her remand for two more days as they claimed she was changing her statements time and again in order to mislead them. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Kaveri Baweja refused to grant this demand and remanded her to 14-day judicial custody. The officer, a specialist interpreter in Urdu, was posted in the media and information wing of the high commission. She came under the scanner after she showed “extraordinary” interest in areas beyond her role in the information wing of the mission. Central security agencies then involved senior MEA officials by briefing them about her activities in Pakistan, which included supplying of sensitive and classified documents related to Indian activities in that country and Afghanistan. A promotee officer of Ministry of External Affairs, Gupta has worked in the mission for nearly three years. The Special Branch of Delhi Police will charge Gupta with offence under the Official Secrets Act of 1923. The Act says that any person charged with disclosing information that is likely to affect the security of the State is punishable by law. Gupta, a second secretary at the Indian mission in Islamabad, was arrested here on April 27. |
India keen to engage ‘empowered' Gilani
After Thimphu, trust building key to emerging dialogue template
The recent empowerment of Pakistani prime minister Yusuf Raza Gilani and his favourable disposition towards peace were important factors in India’s willingness to put the dialogue process back on track.
Providing the first detailed account of the meeting between Prime Minister Manmohan and Mr. Gilani in Thimphu on April 28, senior officials said the question of ‘who India should talk to’ had been answered by the 18th amendment to the Pakistani constitution which enhanced the authority of the prime minister.
But personal equations between the two principals also mattered. “They do manage to communicate well with one another”, an official said. “There is a certain chemistry”. Last year, when Dr. Singh was under fire following the Sharm el-Sheikh summit, Mr. Gilani batted for him by telling reporters that what the Prime Minister had said in Parliament about the controversial joint statement ‘is what we agreed’. Dr. Singh had put an Indian spin on the terror-dialogue delinking issue but the Pakistani PM chose not to score points. “We remember that”, an Indian official told The Hindu. “He seems to be favourably disposed towards peace”.
India is prepared to move ahead on the basis of Mr. Gilani’s latest assurances because the 18th amendment had legally empowered him, the sources said. “In fact, Gilani told us, ‘I’ve come with the authority. I have the support of everyone’.” The sources also appreciated the fact that his statements on India had always been relatively restrained. “Until you show him a door, he has no incentive to start doing anything [about our concerns]. And you give your enemies the chance to say, ‘Look, India is not prepared to budge even a bit’.” Why should we allow them to fuse all Pakistanis behind them, the officials asked.
The sources said India and Pakistan came to Thimphu with constraints but agreed to lower the pitch. “We have opened the door to dialogue. The purpose is to restore trust. That’s what the foreign ministers and foreign secretaries have been tasked to do … This is not a dialogue to solve all issues immediately but to restore trust”.
The officials said Dr. Singh made it clear it is terrorism from Pakistan which has been preventing dialogue. “One of the most important things to restore trust is credible action by Pakistan”. Trust was a dynamic process, the sources said, adding that the “best scenario” would be one where the 26/11 trial ends soon with convictions, Pakistan takes “credible action” against terrorist groups and the dialogue moves alongside. “We had two choices at Thimphu. First, to have ‘talks about talks’. This was the weasel option, of endless arguments about terrorism lists, Kashmir, water etc. The second was to recognise that if the problem is lack of trust, let’s make trust the issue. It opens [things] up”.
Asked if this was a new template, the officials said, “I don’t think you can give it a name. The advantage of this is that it is open. It has potential”.
The one-on-one meeting between the two prime ministers was about clearing the air, the sources said, and not a ‘negotiations meeting’. Mr. Gilani spoke about the problems Pakistan was facing in dealing with terrorism. Dr. Singh replied that the slow pace of the 26/11 trial and the threats being issued by Lashkar-e-Taiba chief Hafiz Saeed were a source of frustration for India. Mr. Gilani said he understood India’s concerns and that his government would find a legal way to address them
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)